Why true decentralization doesn’t fit into national laws – and why that’s exactly why we need it
Ever since Bitcoin was born, one accusation has persisted:
“These blockchains are not compliant with the law!”
It sounds like chaos, anarchy, and loss of control – and that’s exactly what many governments fear most: losing control.
But let’s take a closer look:
Native blockchains like Infinity-Economics (IE) or Bitcoin don’t break laws – they simply operate independently of them.
They are global, open, and borderless – which makes them a foreign body in a world of national interests.
Laws – anything but neutral
Laws are not natural laws.
They are man-made – and therefore always a reflection of power structures.
What is considered progress in one country may be a crime in another.
A bank account that is legal in Switzerland might be “suspicious” elsewhere.
A donation that is permitted here could be forbidden there.
In short: laws are local – freedom is not.
Native blockchains contradict this patchwork of legal systems.
They say: every human being, everywhere in the world, should have the same rights, the same chances, the same rules.
No more – but certainly no less.
This is not an attack on the rule of law, but an invitation to fairness.
Yet fairness is rarely comfortable – especially for those who profit from inequality.
Why “non-compliant” usually just means “uncontrollable”
When politicians or authorities claim that a technology is “not compliant,” it usually means: we can’t control it.
Not because it’s illegal – but because it’s too independent.
A blockchain has no borders.
It doesn’t ask for passports, origins, or religion.
It works the same everywhere – in Zurich as in Seoul, in Lagos as in Buenos Aires.
This neutrality is its strength – and also the reason it’s perceived as a threat.
It escapes national arbitrariness and creates equality where power imbalances exist.
Laws rarely protect freedom – they protect power
The uncomfortable truth is:
About 99% of all laws are not written to protect citizens, but to stabilize existing interests.
A law grants rights to one group that others don’t have – or takes rights away from someone else.
Sometimes out of envy, sometimes out of greed, often disguised as “justice.”
But anyone who loves freedom knows: justice doesn’t need special rights – it needs equal rules for everyone.
That’s exactly what native blockchains do.
They make privileges obsolete.
They implement equality through technology, not politics – and that’s revolutionary.
Infinity-Economics – the fair alternative
Infinity-Economics (IE) is one of the few truly native blockchains – without a central company, without hidden control, without dependency on third parties.
Since 2017, it has run stably, globally, and independently – without a CEO, without a server farm, without a ministry.
In a world where regulation is often used as a tool of power, IE stands as a quiet counter-model:
A system that belongs to no one – and therefore belongs to everyone.
The uncomfortable truth
When someone calls something “lawless,” the first question should be:
Which law is being broken – and who benefits from it?
Native blockchains have never violated the principle of fairness.
On the contrary: they remind us that true justice can only exist where power holds no special privileges.
So perhaps the blockchain isn’t the problem –
but rather the fear that it finally delivers what the law has long promised.
Conclusion
“Lawless” is not an accusation – it’s a misunderstanding.
Native blockchains like Infinity-Economics don’t stand against laws – they stand above national egos.
They create a system where equal rights are guaranteed through technology, without political loopholes.
If freedom today is called “non-compliant,” then maybe it’s time to ask what has happened to our laws.
